And you can power both the transmitter and receiver through USB, so you don’t need to position them near power outlets. But when it has a clear path, the Blackbird Pro system delivers a great-looking picture and supports 7.1-channel audio. The Blackbird Pro’s wireless technology differs from that of our other picks and requires line-of-sight between the transmitter and receiver, so this system works only as an in-room option, and you will experience stability issues if obstructions sit between the two boxes. (Monoprice hasn’t been clear about this update, so much of the online documentation still says the maximum resolution is 1080p/60, but our tests confirmed that it works with 4K.) This system has been our budget pick for years, and a recent upgrade has made it even better: It now supports video signals with a resolution up to 4K/30 Hz. If you’re looking for an easy, affordable way to wirelessly transmit an AV signal across a room-perhaps from a Blu-ray player to a front projector that’s mounted on the back wall or the ceiling-we recommend the Monoprice Blackbird Pro 16049. If you don’t need the HDMI output and the second HDMI input, you can save $50 and get the Nyrius Aries Home instead. The transmitter has two HDMI inputs to connect multiple sources at once, as well as an HDMI output to pass those signals through to a nearby TV.īecause the Aries Home+ is so full featured, it costs a bit more than most competitors. The Aries Home+ also supports infrared pass-through, so you can control your source device when it’s located in another room. Plus, this system boasts the widest array of features, including support for 7.1-channel surround sound (most of these systems support only stereo audio) and the ability to power the receiver unit through your TV’s USB port so you don’t have to plug it into a power outlet. In our tests, the Nyrius Aries Home+ consistently delivered the most stable, reliable wireless signal and offered great picture quality overall. Unfortunately, that’s what you get from many wireless HDMI video transmitters, especially if you’re trying to send the AV signal wirelessly over a long distance, through multiple walls. They are completely different, the only similarity is that they both have a timeline, host plug ins and record audio.There’s nothing worse than sitting down to watch TV and having the video signal freeze, flash on and off, or disappear entirely. Live has crap linear automation, but amazing clip automation, basically for automating FX plug ins doing interesting things it's really very good, for doing surgical work on the final mix, it's not so great. Live's time stretching is vastly superior to DP's, it's the one area it completely dominates DP in. Pitch conversion not so much, DP has better tricks for that. Live takes IMO very little time to wrap your head around, it's mostly set up like an advanced Sampler that also records tracks etc. Looping in Live is far easier and transparent. So if you're writing verse, chorus, break type songs, and want to mess around with the arrangement of that it's dead easy to do.ĭP destroys Live in terms of mixing, in every single way, there are far too may advantages to list, but it allows multiple mixes of the same song in the same open instance, it allows multiple versions of the song in the same Project, it allows multiple choices of automation styles etc. etc.ĭP Deals with SysEx quite nicely, Live doesn't do SysEx at all. In general DP is the king of doing film score type work, and give Pro Tools a run for it's money in terms of mixing and editing audio etc, DP integrates with OSX Core MIDI better than Live, DP plays better with video as well.Įditing wise it's just such a different approach between the two that it's hard to say 100%, DP can conform to an uneven tempo, so you can force the sequence to follow a sloppy piano players recording for instance, Live is slightly easier to use for rigid quantizing, although DP has quantizing preview which is a feature the other DAWs should have stolen if they had any clue. Realistically they are about as far away from each other in terms of DAWs as you can get, Live is a "modern" DAW and DP is a "traditional" DAW, and IMO they are the best of those categories. I recommend you figure on buying both eventually and with that in mind probably DP first, because it's a bigger challenge.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |